Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Something I would like Rick Perry to do

    Something I would like Rick Perry to do

    The Washington Post has a lengthy feature piece on Rick Perry’s attempt to reform state-funded higher education in Texas, Rick Perry wages an assault on state’s university establishment.

    The article clearly was intended to portray Perry as meddling in academic freedom by suggesting cost and performance analyses simliar to the push to inject merit and performance assessments into the public school systems nationwide.  Inevitably these efforts meet with pushback from the educational establishment, for whom alleged intellectual independence frequently is an excuse for  defending bureaucratic turf.

    This passage from the article jumped out at me (emphasis mine):

    At that gathering of the university regents, [Perry friend and campaign contributor Jeff] Sandefer outlined what have since come to be known as “Seven Breakthrough Solutions.” They were developed by the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative think tank closely allied with Perry and on whose board Sandefer sits.

    Professors are wasting time and money churning out esoteric, unproductive research, Sandefer and the foundation have argued, when they should be putting in more hours in the classroom. Among their suggestions: that individual faculty members be measured as profit or loss centers, that research budgets be separated from teaching budgets, and that student evaluations help determine how much professors are paid.

    The highlighted line is so true.

    While we await a reevaluation of how educational goals are measured, how about a partial quick fix:

    Eliminate political science departments, which produce more esoteric unproductive research than all other departments combined; then forbid anyone from using the term “political scientist” without a license, but never create a department to hand out licenses.

    It would be a good start

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Tags:

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    Steve Burri | August 4, 2011 at 3:03 pm

    “…alleged intellectual independence…” Ouch! Bullseye!


     
     0 
     
     0
    SunnyJ | August 4, 2011 at 3:55 pm

    The education bubble is a redistribution plan by Progs that have found a place to funnel treasury from others to them, while they produce work/information/process that would never earn them a living in the market place.

    They review themselves and have convinced society that the more the education costs, the better it is…certainly a look at the degrees bestowed on those responsible for the mess this country is in, especially the ethics courses taught, should be some indication of just how worthy and what value their education was to this country.

    While I agree with many of the initiatives measure, I think we all know that the teacher/student-customer service analogy has some holes in it. Yes, you want good reviews from students. But, I know that some of the best instructors I had, were slammed by the majority of the students because they couldn’t “get by” in their course and they made you work for that A…not just be entitled to it. Until those indoctrinated with the entitlement Prog mentality are not doing all the evaluating of instructors…I thik we need to use this as one of several evaluation tools.

    I teach mathematics and engineering at a Texas community college. When you need the basics (in math, science, etc.) at an affordable cost with professors who actually, you know, teach, you go to the community colleges.

    Afterwards, you can transfer to a four-year state institution for your upper division courses. Often, you will be taught by a graduate assistant who knows little more than you do while the tenured professor (the one who is supposed to be doing the teaching) is off doing research, or protesting against the Iraq War or some other political cause.


     
     0 
     
     0
    FrancisT | August 5, 2011 at 1:53 am

    Someone once suggested that elimination all *-studies and all *-science departments would be an effective budgetary method that would actually increase human knowledge.

    As a ‘computer science’ grad I’m thinking a few *-science departments are actually valuable but I think the overall concept is valid


     
     0 
     
     0
    beloved2 | August 5, 2011 at 1:38 pm

    Agreed. Rick Perry has some great ideas. When he is president, watch for a disbandment of the Department of Education and the NEA. He obviously sees the problems with tenured professors whom the student never sees.
    As to affirmative action grades, just have a look at the pre’sent Obaomao and his wife, both graduates of Professor Jacobson’ law alma mater. Is it true that 67% of Harvard Law School graduates with magna cum laude? My east coast buddies refer to it as the little RED schoolhouse because of all the communists.
    Michael Crichton, graduate of Harvard Medical School has alot to say about his professors there in his autobiography
    indicating a lot of laziness and lack of achievement “because they are accountable to no one”.
    Do you know Harvard is not accredited by any association or state?


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend