Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    University Faculty Union Protects Streaking Professor

    University Faculty Union Protects Streaking Professor

    Edward Larkin, a professor of German at the public University of New Hampshire, plead guilty in November 2009 to charges accusing him of exposing himself to a 17 year old girl and her mother earlier that year. Despite this, he is still fully employed at UNH and collecting his $88,961 salary. Following a one semester suspension this coming Fall, Larkin will be back in the classroom.

    Why? Last week, reporters from the Union-Leader discovered that, in April, an arbitrator ruled that the University could not fire Larkin, as per the language in his union-negotiated contract. According to the arbitrator, Larkin’s actions did constitute “moral deliquency,” but not “moral delinquency of a grave order,” the standard his deeds needed to meet for administrators to dismiss him. An official from the union, the American Association of University Professors, called the ruling “just.”

    In response to criticism from officials as high up as Gov. John Lynch, union officials now say “there is a possibility that Larkin would focus on research rather than teaching” upon his return. Well, that’s much better. Just like the unfit-for-the-classroom employees in the New York City teachers’ union’s “rubber rooms” (which are now closed, except not really), the tuition dollars paid by UNH families will be going to a German teacher . . . that isn’t allowed to teach.

    (H/T Inside Higher Ed)

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    windbag | July 8, 2011 at 3:41 pm

    He needs a better spokesperson. This is a free speech issue, not a sexually deviancy issue. He’s a victim. Marketing is key.


     
     0 
     
     0
    iowan2 | July 8, 2011 at 7:54 pm

    This is why liberals have no credibility. Here we have a pervert that cannot control himself and the libs dont see any problem with that.

    this over at althouse
    http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/no-downside-not-raising-debt-ceiling-says-chris-120559135.html

    Here a femminsist cant stand an elevator ride with guys doing what guys do. hit on girls.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Edward | July 9, 2011 at 9:53 am

    I have to object to the “headline”. The use of “Streaking” carries implications of youthful pranks, while this cretin exposed his penis to two women, one a minor, while otherwise remaining fully clothed. I seem to recollect the term which used to be used for those with this particular perversion was “flasher”, “streaker” carries a totally different connotation.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend