Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    The first ever “live coverage” of a document release, with conclusions jumped to by people with an agenda spread in real time via Twitter by the elite of the mainstream media.

    The first ever “live coverage” of a document release, with conclusions jumped to by people with an agenda spread in real time via Twitter by the elite of the mainstream media.

    I get so infuriated when Republicans pile on Sarah Palin not over policy but through personal insult because these people don’t seem to understand that they are joining in a mob which eventually will come around to beat down their own favorite candidate.  And as of today, it has become even more of a feeding frenzy as the elites of the mainstream media have given up any pretense of neutrality or news reporting, and literally are forming mobs of anti-Palin readers in a joint effort to take her down.

    For two and one-half years the mainstream media, entertainment industry, and left-blogosphere have been perfecting how to destroy a Republican presidential nominee, and they have been practicing on Palin.  Those tactics, including the complete fabrication tying Palin to the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords, know no bounds.

    The latest tactic employed by two of the most prestigious liberal newspapers, The Washington Post and The New York Times, is to use “crowdsourcing” to enlist a legion of Palin haters to sift through e-mails to be released today by the State of Alaska. 

    As described by Jim Treacher at The Daily Caller, NYT, WaPo give up even pretending to be news organizations, “They’re an opposition research arm of the Democratic Party.”

    The Washington Post describes the effort as follows:

    Over 24,000 e-mail messages to and from former Alaska governor Sarah Palin during her tenure as Alaska’s governor will be released Friday. That’s a lot of e-mail for us to review so we’re looking for some help from Fix readers to analyze, contextualize, and research those e-mails right alongside Post reporters over the days following the release.

    We are limiting this to just 100 spots for people who will work collaboratively in small teams to surface the most important information from the e-mails. Participants can join from anywhere with a computer and an Internet connection. Read more about how it will work.

    If you need inspiration before getting started, take a look at what to expect from the e-mail drop. For micro-updates as tomorrow unfolds, check out our new Twitter feed.

    That’s right folks, “live coverage” of a document release, with conclusions jumped to by people with an agenda, spread in real time via Twitter by the elite of the mainstream media.

    The crowdsourcing by hundreds will give rise thousands of lies about Palin.  These two news organizations, by lending their names to and organizing the effort, have abdicated any journalistic standard in favor of mob information rule.

    Team Sarah is organizing a counter-effort, and encouraging supporters to sign up at The Times and Washington Post as volunteers.

    When it comes to Palin, the media and mob combine.  So as you Republicans pile on Palin, please know that your favorite candidate is next.

    Update:  To show you how bad the media is when it comes to Palin, The Politico wrote an article including a quote from Palin in which Palin claimed credit for building the Tea Party movement.  When I read I thought that the quote was real, and did not make Palin look good.  It turns out the quote is a complete fabrication.  Yet I have no doubt that the fictitious quote will enter the public consciousness as real, as so many other fictional Palin faults have done.

    And thanks to commenter VoterMom for the link to this pathetic statement by the WaPo Ombudsman trying to justify the crowdsourcing maneuver:

    Sarah Palin and her e-mails are just too darn irresistible….

    But then the reality of Palin-mania set in. First of all, it didn’t take long for 100 people to sign up, and far more were waiting in line. The Post was trying to screen volunteers for knowledge, ability and political bias, but quickly got overwhelmed by the volume….

    So The Post changed course later in the afternoon. Interactivity Editor Hal Straus said in an interview that upon reflection and in light of the huge interest, The Post would make its crowd call more open.

    The updated call-out went up around 6 p.m. with this language: “We’ll share your comments with our reporters and may use facts or related material you suggest to annotate the documents displayed on The Post site. We may contact you for further details, by way of your registered e-mail with the Post, unless you specify otherwise in the comments.”

    What is not “too darn irresistible” for WaPo is an organized effort to obtain access to and analysis of Obama’s legislative history, fraudulent campaign credit card activities, or just about anything else which might imperil Obama’s reelection.

    Related Posts:
    Dear Michele Bachmann, If Ed Rollins Stays, I Go
    Who Will Leave First, Anthony Weiner or Ed Rollins?
    Michele Bachmann Needs To Dump Ed Rollins Now

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Maybe all this is just a brilliant attempt at making the Twitter behavior of Anthony Weiner seem cautious … almost frigid, by comparison.

    NY Times & Washington Post:

    "Hey readers, you wanna help us f*** that &#@**$ing witch Sarah Palin until she %*#%! while we grab her ponytail and &[email protected]!&!% her while you hold her down and #*@*&$ her like you know she loves it? Oh man, if yours isn't bobbing up and down … if it isn't dripping like a &@%(#!!$ right now, then maybe you're reading the wrong rag and should drag your sorry butt over to the couch so you can take your marching orders from Faux News, you wingnut #@&(*$# neanderthal hater!! Tee hee hee hee … are you as hot as me, our nuanced, sophisticated readership??

    LukeHandCool (who shakes his head in disbelief at the man who will risk his family … or the newspaper that will risk what little integrity it has left … for something so unimportant as an orgasm).

    The WaPo ombudsman defends their "crowd-sourcing" idea, the first sentence in his post, I am not kidding, is this:

    Sarah Palin and her e-mails are just too darn irresistible.

    Yup, this is all her own irresistable, immodest, sack-of-sin fault, tempting virtuous men to fall from grace. Stone her.

    It's a real double-standard. Republicans don't attack Dick Cheney for letting the media caricature him as Darth Vader, or George W. Bush for letting the media caricature him as an imbecile. But when it comes to Sarah Palin, they throw her to the wolves.

    I'm happy so many people are going to be digging through Palin's emails, this surely means that the same will soon be true for the other candidates from 2008.

    Someone please tell me how we are not now in the throes of a full blown ideological war here in America?

    This action is not just compelling evidence of these two newspapers openly and brazenly enlisting themselves on the side of a political party movement . . . which would itself be a unique and foreboding event in modern American history!

    No . . . heretofore, these two news-gathering outlets had tried to maintain at least a pretense of objectivity, a wall of separation between their news and editorial expressions.

    This action much more than just further blurs that ever-crumbling line! It is a case of two "elite" news organizations deliberately provoking an electronic mob.

    The NYT and the WaPo have just cast aside the last vestiges of their own senses of civility and haughty superiority, couched all these years in claims of pursuing a "higher purpose."

    Note the tentative and telling "first offer" from the WaPo . . . the proposed limitation to 100 select deputies . . . which was just as quickly cast aside by them in the face of the NYT open invitation to all! They obviously had at least some initial misgivings, but "monkey see, monkey do" has held sway.

    Fingers stabbing away, they both have just pointed accusingly — out across the angry crowd of nasty little ginned-up ideologues — at "the hated one."

    Nakedly and shamefully demonstrating their own inadequacy to the task, they have each gnashed their teeth, and shouted out loud over the little mob of haters, "There she is! GET 'ER!

    Behold the ugly face of the Enmity of the Elites!

    * * *

    kitty June 10, 2011 6:59 AM | . . .
    "Which is why I wonder if the anti-Palin mob will fabricate e-mails. "

    Kitty, I think you can stop wondering!

    Out of this press-deputized posse of "official" NYT/WaPo opposition researchers, there will arise a significant group of swaggering "Palinaters" who will, hereafter, each crow endlessly in comment sections across the blogosphere of their on-line status as an "official" NYT or WaPo Deputy, "back in the late spring of '11 when we rode out after the bitch!"

    And each one will no doubt adopt as their imagined "scalp," or badge of honor, some short or out of context phrase, or "ever so slightly" edited remark of hers, gleefully dug from the bowels of the email heap, and held aloft as their "proof" of nothing.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend