Hey, they’ve run fake Tea Party candidates against us to siphon off votes from Republicans, so I can’t get upset over the fact that Republicans are running “fake” Democrats in the primaries for the Wisconsin special elections in which Republican Senators are targeted.
By requiring Democrats challenging sitting Republican Senators to have a primary, the Republicans bought time for the Senators who have not been able to campaign because the legislature was in session.
But in a move which is reminiscent of Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos, it appears that the rules and timing open up the possibility that the “fake” Democrats could win the primaries, particularly if Republicans show up in force in the open primaries.
As reported by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel:
But could any of them actually knock off a Democrat in the July 12 primaries, saving a GOP incumbent from having to face a serious challenger in the Aug. 9 general election?
At first glance, it’s not out of the question. And at least one close political observer sees it as a real possibility, though others are skeptical.
There are no GOP primaries that day, so under Wisconsin’s open primary system, Republican voters can cross party lines and vote for the fake Democrats.
And each of the six Senate districts where the primaries will be staged was won by a Republican in 2008, a strong Democratic year, so presumably there are plenty of Republican voters out there.
In addition, says Mordecai Lee, political science professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, the primary elections are likely to have very low voter participation, and low-turnout elections tend to attract more conservative voters than high-turnout races.
The article indicates the likelihoood of success still is low, and that the Wisconsin Republican Party will not be helping the “fake” Democrats. But that does not prevent outside groups from getting involved, or prevent another “Operation Chaos” organized via the radio and blogosphere.
Not that I ever would suggest such a thing, I’m just saying.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Ron Coleman
Comments
Aggie95, it looks to me like John Hinderaker of Powerline has the best take on the Prosser Bradley brouhaha so far. In particular, the exact timing of the incident, coupled with the fact that no one has brought any charges (but have instead leaked the pro-Bradley version to the press) suggest that John’s suggested version of how the events unfolded likely spot-on.
From his post (with an indented quote from the Journal Sentinel story):
I love it. The democrats will be employing dead voters, numerous “Mickey Mouse [Mice?]” and “Donald Ducks” and illegal aliens against each other. I can see ACORN registering phantom voters so that democrat A will beat democrat B.
They will be reduced to suing each other which will show everyone what dirty tricks the democrats are capable of.
Somehow, in posting my comment above, I managed to inadvertently link back here to LI in an effort to post to John Hinderaker’s take on Powerline regarding the Wisconsin judicial jostling incident.
Here was the appropriate link to John’s take from yesterday evening . . . A New Low In Wisconsin.
Also, Ann Althouse is having fun citing efforts to try to track down exactly how many unnamed sources provided the “basis” for the first highly charged and pretty obviously skewed version of the story, written by its original peddler, one Bill Lueders of what Ann refers to as the “mysterious outfit that calls itself the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism.” She likens the mystery to a game of Clue.
You can’t call Republican candidates in this primary “Fake Democrats” because that’s based on the false premise that the purpose of a recall election is to permit one major party to reverse the election of an opponent. Not so. The purpose is so that an elected official who is doing a horrible job can be replaced. What constitutes a horrible job is up to each individual voter.
Unlike a general election (or the primaries that lead up to them) it’s a non-partisan election. You can vote for recalling a Democrat because you don’t think they’re liberal enough just as well as because you think they’re too liberal. You could have a group of Tea Party Movement members trying to get rid of a RINO.
Thus, you cannot assume that the opposition candidate is automatically to be of the other party. As a matter of law this election was not organized to replace a member of one party with a member of another, it was to overthrow an incumbent for whatever reason the electorate desires.
No one party can be presumed to own the challenger spot. You cannot assume that the primary in a recall election is to pick an opponent from Party X if the incumbent is a member of Party Y. I’m sure the members of Party Z would vociferously protest that concept.
Leave a Comment