Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Uh huh

    Uh huh

    Looks like the blogosphere may be onto something.

    I’m beginning to feel like a moth drawn to light.  Hopefully not to fire.

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Van Halen | May 31, 2011 at 6:16 pm

    Why won't the Weiner admit as to whether he sent the picture or not?

    Well, that was a pretty weak erection he would be admitting to. And his underwear is not particularly manly, to boot. Not only is he a weasel, but he seems to be acting like he is going to get away with the "I've dealt with this issue and now I'm moving on" charade.

    If the Democrats and moderate Republicans wouldn't impeach Clinton, why should this twerp worry?

    kitty | May 31, 2011 at 8:40 pm

    Wow, I watched the entire 9:22 minutes (URL supplied by Cowboy Curtis). Weiner spent 7:35 minutes saying how he wasn't going to be distracted by it and trying to change the subject. And he called someone a jackass at the end.

    Whenever he was asked did you or didn't you, he referred them to his previous prepared statements, to which the reporters replied that his statements did not answer the question. Then once again he launched into his not-gonna-to-be-distracted meme. Round and round he goes. Will he go down the drain? Stay tuned!

    I just checked the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel online version and searched under "weiner twitter". Their closest match was "trainer hitter". I think that has something to do with baseball. Then I searched "twitter". Nothing. So that newspaper doesn't think much of this story. Really a non-story. Hey! Where is Katie Couric when we need her?

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend