Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Obama’s Greatest Foreign Policy Victory – Manuel Zelaya Returns To Honduras

    Obama’s Greatest Foreign Policy Victory – Manuel Zelaya Returns To Honduras

    The Obama administration has not had many foreign policy victories.  But it just consummated a long hoped-for victory in Honduras with the return of former President Manuel Zelaya, a close ally of Hugo Chavez.

    Zelaya was forced into exile after Zelaya tried to extend his term as President in violation of the Honduran constitution.  Zelaya was deposed by the military acting on orders of the Honduran Supreme Court and the Honduran Congress.

    Throughout 2009 the U.S. orchestrated intense pressure on Honduras, including facilitating the exclusion of Honduras from the Organization of American States, threatened sanctions, and disruption of the ability of Honduran officials to travel to the United States.  The fact that Honduras was acting in accordance with its own law as interpreted by its own Supreme Court in order to prevent a Chavez-style President-for-Life debacle meant nothing to the Obama administration.

    For those of you who want some history, see my prior posts:

    In order to ease the pressure, Honduras finally agreed that Zelaya could return, and he did so this weekend, as reported at Fausta’s Blog and La Gringa’s Blogicito.

    Zelaya returned on a Venezuelan plane accompanied by Daniel Ortega and a top Chavez assistant, and has pledged to reenter politics:

    Expect trouble, as Zelaya will waste no time in spiking the football with anti-American and pro-Chavez agitation.

    ——————————————–
    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    Of course President Obama is going to try to get Zelaya returned. Yes, Zelaya tried to extend his term as President in violation of the Honduran constitution. But, you have to remember Obama's point of view on Constitutions: They are LIVING DOCUMENTS meant to be REINTERPRETED in view of changed situations, and (sarcasm) this was OBVIOUSLY a changed situation.

    It's a complete ignorance of history or definition of the term "Constitution" on Obama's part, but what can we expect from a "Constitutional Law Lecturer" and not a professor.

    P.S.- I'm eagerly awaiting the upcoming Presidential race, for that key moment when the Republican candidate says to President Obama:

    "Well, you never wrote any articles as a 'Harvard Law Review Editor,' you were never a professor as Chicago Law, you were merely a lecturer, and you got that only because of your political connections. What gives you any more authority to tell us how the Constitution should be interpreted than anybody else with a Juris Doctor Degree?"

    It will be CLASSIC.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend