Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Can Newt be next?

    Can Newt be next?


    The Donald won’t be running for president after teasing (threatening?) the American people for a few weeks. I’m glad that the less serious candidates are starting to drop out and folks like Mitch Daniels are giving a nod and a wink to the race. The second most destructive GOP bid is, in my opinion, Newt Gingrich – particularly after his performance on MTP yesterday where he gave a rather uncharitable reading of Paul Ryan’s budget proposals. Yuval Levin weighed in on the Corner:
    On the Ryan budget’s Medicare reform, Gingrich basically echoed the liberal talking point that moving to a premium-support system starting in ten years (and only for people who would retire at that point or later) was too radical. Instead, he said, “we need a national conversation to get to a better Medicare system with more choices for seniors.” His own contributions to that conversation, he suggested, would be ways of addressing fraud in Medicare and the notion that “I think what you want to have is a system where people voluntarily migrate to better outcomes.”
    Fraud is, of course, a huge problem in Medicare and should be addressed, but it is hardly the essence of our health-care financing crisis. Gingrich’s second point was specific-sounding enough that it presumably refers to some particular idea. But what would that be? Perhaps a premium-support system as an option alongside today’s fee-for-service Medicare? Such an approach was considered during the Clinton years (a form of it was proposed by the Breaux-Thomas commission in 1997) but eventually killed by the White House and congressional Democrats. If that’s what Gingrich is saying, then let him say so and argue out its benefits and drawbacks compared to the (very similar) Ryan proposal, rather than just parrot Charles Schumer’s talking points about radicalism in a way that hands the Democrats a weapon to use against any real reform. Calling such reforms radical while repeating unfounded Democratic talking points is certainly an effective way to undermine such solutions.
    I’ll be honest, Newt Gingrich embarrasses me as a history major, an American, and as a registered Republican (forgive me for linking to ThinkProgress video). The only person he seems to be consistently in favor, and in defense of, is himself.

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!

    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    I can't wait to watch Hannity tonight. Hannity has been to Gingrich what Chris Matthews has been to Obama. Tingly leg syndrome.

    At least Trump served the useful prupose of reminding conservatives that none of the "serious" "electable" RINOs (including Pawlenty) have any in them and that the GOP establishment will still throw anyone under the bus who does not have Rove's stamp of approval and yet attacks Obama anyway. Just like 2008.

    We are now again free to agonize about the embarrassingly lame field of GOP candidates standing around doing nothing. The noseholders are again in the drivers seat.

    Believe it or not, but I remember in the late '80s, early '90s, there were some very serious conservative thinkers and pundits who thought Gingrich was the natural successor to the "Reagan Revolution". Seriously.

    Man, how he has fallen.

    Completely agree with K and others on this thread. Newt is old/bad/sad/dead news. And he is so enamored of himself he can't see it.

    As to the "lack of a candidate" problem, the only place that creates an issue is for Dhimo house spokespersons/media types who have no one to tear down or rant about right now, and thus cannot earn their keep. I'm perfectly fine with waiting several months until a couple of real candidates come forth.

    I have not seen a single candidate that has addressed the ongoing stealth jihad, which is the most important issue to me. The only potential candidate about whom I have heard any positive commentary on this score is Allen West.

    As Governor of Minnesota, Tim Pawlenty had has Housing Finance Agency set up a Sharia-compliant lending fund so Muslims could purchase homes without paying interest. He shut down the fund after 18 months, and later claimed he didn't know about it. Very suspicious.

    Mitch Daniels has received an award from the Arab American Institute, an anti-American and anti-Israel organization according to Discover the Networks. While his recent school reform victory gives me encouragement, in my book, this is enough for me to write him off.

    I want a candidate who clearly and confidently knows what to do about Hamas-linked CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the US. So far, I haven't seen one, except Allen West. So he has my vote thus far above all the others.

    And then there was the "cuddling up to fleebaggers" to attack Indiana Republicans over their proposed Rignt to Work legislation.

    Daniels is a lot like Gingrich in that he is in it for himself. Not a team player.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend