Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Mother Nature is a Keynesian (and other lefty fairy tales)

    Mother Nature is a Keynesian (and other lefty fairy tales)

    Jonathan Swift himself could not have written better satire than Nathan Gardels in his most recent HuffPo post:

    No one — least of all someone like myself who has experienced the existential terror of California’s regular tremors and knows the big one is coming here next — would minimize the grief, suffering and disruption caused by Japan’s massive earthquake and tsunami.
    The need to rebuild a large swath of Japan will create huge opportunities for domestic economic growth, particularly in energy-efficient technologies, while also stimulating global demand and hastening the integration of East Asia. … Japan has been wallowing in stagnation for years despite massive government stimulus programs and zero-interest rates because, simply put, in such an advanced, mature economy there was too little demand to generate sufficient returns to attract private investment. Thus the famous “bridges to nowhere” and other projects that amounted to pushing a string.
    By taking Japan’s mature economy down a notch, Mother Nature has accomplished what fiscal policy and the central bank could not.

    Larry Summers only alluded to this, but this fellow goes on to explore the implications of what Summers could have meant. I mean, thousands may have had their lives ruined, but their status quo was just getting the way of their “[position] for a green recovery.” I waxed on about how the Broken Window Fallacy is still alive and kicking, but this post leads me to pick another bone with leftists commentators….

    I’m always repulsed by the way environmentalists see (their typically failed predictions and) ideas come before people. A more extreme example would be John Holdren, our Science advisor to the President. In a 1969 article, Holdren argued that, “if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”

    In 1973 Holdren encouraged a decline in fertility, and in 1977, he co-authored the textbook Ecoscience; discussing the possible role of a wide variety of solutions to overpopulation, from voluntary family planning to enforced population controls, including forced sterilization for women after they gave birth to a designated number of children, and recommended “the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences” such as access to birth control and abortion.


    Of course, just like campus Marxists, these people prefer grandiose change that may jeopardize the lives of others because they think they’ll be at the helms of revolution.

    ——————————————–
    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!

    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    When all you've got is a hammer…..

    It sounds like he'd be against global warming unless it promised to wipe out most of the human race, in which case he'd be for it, because, as most lefties will try to tell you, they are "fiscally conservative," and this would prove to be the ultimate in stimulus.

    He'd also tell you this would be an "investment" in the future and that it would "pay for itself," etc., etc., etc.

    You'd think these people would be pro-war. It must be agonizing to wait for an economically stimulating, once-in-1,000 years earthquake and tsunami.

    Anybody who tells you these people aren't sick in the head needs his head examined.

    William, there is a hypocritically psychological facet to the Leftist dream as well.

    Having rejected all versions of a higher power, even a Socratic version, why then do they always insist on the version of the future that involves self-flagellation and sack cloth and ashes?

    Perhaps their attempts at personal and economic control signal attempted usurpation, what some call a God-complex. I just call it emotionally retarded narcissism.

    I no longer read the Huffington Post. It is a waste of my precious time:)


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend