Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Before We Spend $53 Billion On High-Speed Rail, Can We Get Low-Speed Rail To Run On Time?

    Before We Spend $53 Billion On High-Speed Rail, Can We Get Low-Speed Rail To Run On Time?

    Florida Governor Rick Scott has rejected Stimulus funds for the beginnings of a high speed rail system in Florida, claiming the proposed rail system was unnecessary and wasteful. 

    These stimulus funds were just a part of what the Obama administration hopes will be $53 billion on building a national high-speed rail network.

    Before we spend $53 billion on high-speed rail, can we try to get low-speed rail to run on time?

    Let’s start with the existing experiment with “high-speed” rail, the Acela Express between Boston and Washington, D.C.

    And then hop aboard the Northeast Regional between Boston and Virginia Beach:

    Followed by a transfer to the scenic Lake Shore Limited between New York and Chicago:

    And move on to the City of New Orleans between New Orleans and Chicago:

    There is something which seems to make the trains run on time, Cars:

    Sounds like a plan, a nationwide network of autotrains.  And Early Bird Specials.

    Related Posts:
    I Beat Obama By 22 Months
    Miles of Sidewalks, and Empty Stores
    The Fierce Urgency of Sow

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Good. I'm glad high-speed rail is dead. It was a stupid, pointless idea putting a high speed train route between two cities separated by a drive of a little over an hour. I know the reasoning behind it, but from what I had been hearing it would be cheaper for passengers to rent a car and drive the route rather than pay for an overpriced ticket, hop aboard a train, and hail a cab on the way out. This particular project has been doubly annoying because of all the local news outlets crowing about how important it was and how much it would benefit Orlando's economy (Channel 9 was especially vocal about its support for the project).

    Good for Scott. So far I'm happy with what I voted for.

    A possible planning session within Team Obama:

    Jack:  The stimulus should have had more effect.
    Bob:  I don't understand it myself. All of that spending produced so few jobs.

    Jack:  Shhh! Never say it that way. Say "Our investment in the economy prevented a total collapse and preserved over 2 million jobs".
    Bob:  We would need much more than 2 million jobs to have a full recovery.

    Jack:  So far so good.
    Bob:  We have to spend more.

    Jack:  They're laughing at us. Obama promised shovel ready jobs, then he admitted that there weren't any. Almost all of the stimulus went to reduce state and household borrowing. If we spend more now, we must be able to point to the projects. Good, union work projects.
    Bob:  How about building railroads, the miracle of the 19th century? Everyone likes railroads.

    Jack:  We have plenty of railroads, and lots of capacity in our recession.
    Bob:  High speed passenger rail, like the Simpson's Monorail. We can point to the trains, and they will go everywhere.

    Jack:  Passenger rail loses money.
    Bob:  The point is to spend enough to end this recession. It doesn't matter where it is spent, as long as we spend enough. And we will borrow enough to support the spending. Borrowing is free, because we won't have to pay it back during our administration. The Republicans will have to pay it back, if we're lucky. Or unlucky. Or something.

    Jack:  That is actually good. You have exceeded yourself. Spend and spend, with real, steel tracks and big engines to point to. Shovel ready and unionized. This will save us all.
    Bob:  (1) Spend lots of money.  (2) ???  (3) We will all be rich.

    Jack:  Just like the Underpants Gnomes (skip to 17:40. Sorry about the 30 second commercial.).

    Amtrak and the PO'd consumer…

    "In summary taking Amtrak was a terrible experience. Arrogant unfriendly personnel, dirty bathrooms, cold temperatures because A.C. is turned up too high, dirty windows, too uncomfortable to get any sleep, trains don’t run on time, for what they charge for a sleeper you may as well fly. I would never take Amtrak again, I would drive first."


    The Detroit-Chicago route is an example of what we perhaps ought to be doing and what we may well wind up doing.

    My understanding, and I don't claim to be anything other than an interested layman, is that with improvements to the roadbed and signaling some modification to the equipment, and giving passenger trains the right of way, we could get the downtown to downtown run down to three and a half hours or so.

    We need to keep in mind that a lot of the traffic on the route is not Detroit-Chicago but Detroit-Kalamazoo or Battle Creek-Chicago, say. I am told that this improvement, which would have some impact on road and air travel, would cost about a tenth that of high-speed rail.

    The high-speed rail requires new and separate trackage, among other things, and would bring the downtown to downtown run down to about two and a half hours. In other words, to save an hour on the trip, a journey many passengers will not make in full, we are going to spend several billion dollars that we don't need to in order to make improvements that may be helpful.

    Multiply this by St. Louis-Chicago, LA-san Francisco, and so forth, and we'll be paying for decades for something we don't really need.

    Boston/New York round trip:

    Acela Business Class – about $250.00
    Northeast Regional train – about $200.00
    US Air – about $255.00
    Limoliner – about $160
    Bolt Bus – about $40.00
    Megabus – about $25-40.00
    LuckyStar – about $30.00
    FungWah – about $30.00

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend