Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    An Alternative Explanation – People Who Fear Competition And Live Off Government Tend To Be Liberal

    An Alternative Explanation – People Who Fear Competition And Live Off Government Tend To Be Liberal

    This is a follow up to my earlier post about the findings by a social psychlogist that there is a “statistically impossible” skew in the percentages of social psychologists who self-identify as liberal and conservative, reflecting a pervasive bias against conservatives throughout the social sciences.

    Paul Krugman helps us out in understanding this phenomenon by pointing to academia.  Krugman explains that there is no discrimination as such, it’s simply that liberals are smarter and more open-minded, as proven by the predominance of liberals even in the hard sciences at universities:

    “It’s particularly troubling to apply some test of equal representation when you’re looking at academics who do research on the very subjects that define the political divide. Biologists, physicists, and chemists are all predominantly liberal; does this reflect discrimination, or the tendency of people who actually know science to reject a political tendency that denies climate change and is broadly hostile to the theory of evolution?”

    Interesting that Krugman does not consider an alternative explanation, namely, that academia is a place largely free from the pressures of free markets.  Indeed, the whole system of tenure is meant to give academics the functional equivalent of a civil service job; once you’re in it’s extremely difficult to kick you out even if your productivity drops dramatically once job security is achieved. 

    Is it really shocking to find that people who gravitate towards an employment cocoon tend to be liberal? Does this reflect innate intelligence or a lifestyle choice?

    Equally important, scientific research at universities is heavily dependent upon government grants, for example, from the National Sciences Foundation.  Being in favor of smaller government is not a path to success in the academic science world. 

    Yet again, is it really surprising that people who live off of big government support big government?  Is the ability to obtain government grants a valid measure of intellectual open-mindedness?

    Perhaps we need a comparative study. 

    Compare the political self-identification of the scientific entrepreneurs who have built companies and created new industries and national wealth through competition with the political self-identification of those who fear free market competition and live off government funding at universities or in government institutions.

    The academic cocoon serves a purpose, at least in the sciences.  I’m glad that there are professors who spend their careers doing basic research which may not pay for itself in the short-run, but may be valuable to the overall development of science. 

    But let’s not pretend that the predominance of self-identified liberals in academia reflects anything other than a career choice.

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Maybe this was included, but other than viewpoint discrimination – they hate Republicans or their erstwhile like-minded citizens, issue by issue, there is the fantasy world of academia. Reality can be avoided there.

    Business people are smart however less acutely they are gathered; it's a wonderful well-rounded person who can be an effective manager.


    No women in science? It cant possibly be because many women dont care for them.. It MUST be due to institutional sexism..

    Not enough black people graduating from high school? It cant possible be because many of them dont give a crap about school.. It MUST be due to institutional racism.

    No conservatives in the Social Sciences? This has nothing to do with any institutional bias against conservatives. It MUST be because conservatives are simply stupid and dont go on to higher degrees.

    There is absolutely no hypocrisy there at all.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Send this to a friend