Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03
    Announcement
     
    Announcement
     

    If “She Can’t Win,” Then Neither Can We

    If “She Can’t Win,” Then Neither Can We

    I have been addressing in some detail the assertion that Sarah Palin should not be seriously considered by Republican voters because Palin cannot win a general election, so I will not repeat myself. 

    Admittedly, I have been somewhat narrow in my focus, driven by circumstances that the “can’t win” meme is being used currently against Palin almost exclusively.   (Obamacrats — “She can’t win”, describes how the “can’t win” strategy works.)

    The issue is not Sarah Palin.

    The issue is whether we will demoralize voters who would work hard to elect a Republican — even a Republican not quite to their liking — in the general election provided the primary process were viewed as fair and open.

    We saw in the 2010 elections that Tea Party supporters are among the most loyal.  Where Tea Party candidates lost primaries, Tea Party supporters rallied around the winner, or at least did not actively seek to undermine the winners.  By contrast, the moment establishment candidates lost, there were active attempts in some races by establishment Republicans (and unfortunately, some of the conservative blogosphere) to undermine the candidates.

    There is no better way to demoralize a key segment of the Republican Party, and damage our chances in November 2012, than to announce a year before the primaries even begin that Palin should not even enter the primary fray or should not be seriously considered because she cannot win a general election.

    We do not need the Republican equivalents of 2008 Democratic PUMAs, people so embittered by the perceived unfairness of the primary process that they stayed home or switched sides in November.  And that will be the result of attempts to shut Palin out of the process through the “can’t win” strategy. 

    The same holds true for other potential Republican candidates — let them all enter the primaries and let them all be seriously considered regardless of what polling tells us now is the likelihood of success. 

    Let’s have a process focused on issues, and yes, as part of the process electability inevitably is going to be one of the issues.  But let’s not undermine ourselves by telling Sarah Palin, or Tim Pawlenty, or Mitch Daniels, or Mitt Romney or anyone else that they are wasting our time by running because they cannot win a general election. 

    And let’s not insult their supporters with the same message.  Remember, after the primaries the Lombardi Rule will take effect, and we are going to have to unite to defeat the billion-dollar candidate.

    If “she can’t win” is the means by which one of the candidates wins the Republican nomination, then we can’t win either.

    ——————————————–
    Related Posts:
    Washington Post Now Not Even Trying To Hide Its Hatred Of Sarah Palin
    It Sounds So Much Better Read Out Loud

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    If i were the democrats, the first thing i would do is to goad sarah palin into running and make sure she wins the primaries via Operation Chaos.

    I guarantee you Bill if Palin gets nominated, the tea party will become irrelevant after nov 2012.

    If i were the democrats, the first thing i would do is to goad sarah palin into running and make sure she wins the primaries via Operation Chaos.

    I guarantee you Bill if Palin gets nominated, the tea party will become irrelevant after nov 2012.

    My money back if you are not satisfied?

    "My money back if you are not satisfied? "

    are you one of the 3 or 4 tea partier who thinks palin will win against obama in 2012? you probably thought christine o'witch was a great choice to run against the generic democrat marxist too huh?

    And she wouldn't have been alone. Hoffman did the same

    You are mistaken, Grand Inquistor. Mr. Hoffmann garnered the nomination of the Conservative Party of New York before the primary election he lost to Matthew Doheny. He could not be removed from the ballot but did endorse Doheny.

    In the special election in 2009, Mr. Hoffmann also ran as a 3d party candidate. The thing is, there had been no primary. The Republican candidate was a selection of the county chairman. She was selected only reluctantly – money men from central office were leaning hard on them. That candidate was a state capitol insider and a living breathing manifestation of the pathologies of New York politics. When her candidacy imploded, she withdrew and endorsed the Democratic candidate.

    The establishment GOP in New York manifest little interest in public policy and have only themselves to blame for losses in this race and several others.

    I think the leftists will also try to convince us that the effort to repeal Obamacare program is futile if the Senate doesn't address. It's the same psychology that Professor Jacobson speaks to in this article:

    http://reformaliberal.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/an-invitation-to-debate-the-obamacare-repeal-efforts/

    Don't let them sell this crock of crap.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend