Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Worst Argument Ever Against TSA Screening

    Worst Argument Ever Against TSA Screening

    From the “How do they think this stuff up?” files comes the absolutely worst argument ever against TSA screening procedures at airports:

    All things considered, though, I’d still rather just put less emphasis on airport security. Actually preventing terrorist attacks is a valuable thing to do, but it seems to me that very intensity security at airports doesn’t so much eliminate attacks as encourage people to set off bombs on crowded city streets instead. That doesn’t strike me as a particularly high-value undertaking.

    Who would write such a thing? 

    If you need to ask, you haven’t been reading this blog for long.

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    I don't know what's more disturbing. That schmuckface (Yglesias) believes this, or that his minion of shmeckles all agree with him.

    Just wow.

    This thought comes to mind:
    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on health care: “We’ll go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in but we're going to get health care reform passed for the America people." Notice how leftists seem to think similarily with jihadists? They are just doing what they do for our own good using any means neccessary.

    I like the idea of someone inventing an explosion proof booth for security screening that detonates any explosive it finds.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend