Everyone seems to be doing the “Best Of” thing this time of year.
Worth a try? If so, what?
Would it be completely pretentious to do a “Best Of” my posts for the past year?
If not, any favorites?
(In case you were wondering, I am not taking suggestions for “Worst Of”).
——————————————–
Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Ron Coleman
Comments
I find it funny how just the context of how something is presented changes how it's received:
My immediate reaction to "Best of", especially when chosen by the author, is that it is rather pretentious. However, selecting the exact same entries and calling it "The Year in Review" or "My Favorite Posts of 2010" bothers me not at all.
I hate "Best of." It's an excuse to take a vacation, usually prerecorded and hyped extensively to build excitement because someone wants to sleep in instead of blog. Plus it's like recycling. Highly green and such a lie.
A Wish List is much better. Oop! I see that's the latest post. Bravo!
Your Dijon-Gate post MUST be included, Professor. It's a classic, and put you on the liberals' hate list.
Leave a Comment