Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    No Negotiation With WikiTerrorists

    No Negotiation With WikiTerrorists

    If there were any doubt that WikiLeaks is not about open government, but giving aid and comfort to enemies of the U.S., then the latest release of a State Department document listing facilities vital to U.S. security ends any doubt. 

    The document is described by the BBC — hardly a right-wing organization — as a terrorist wish list:

    A long list of key facilities around the world that the US describes as vital to its national security has been released by Wikileaks.

    In February 2009 the State Department asked all US missions abroad to list all installations whose loss could critically affect US national security.

    The list includes pipelines, communication and transport hubs.

    Several UK sites are listed, including cable locations, satellite sites and BAE Systems plants.

    BBC diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says this is probably the most controversial document yet from the Wikileaks organisation….

    The critical question is whether this really is a listing of potential targets that might be of use to a terrorist, our correspondent says.

    The cable contains a simple listing. In many cases towns are noted as the location but not actual street addresses, although this is unlikely to stop anyone with access to the internet from locating them.

    There are also no details of security measures at any of the listed sites.

    What the list might do is to prompt potential attackers to look at a broader range of targets, especially given that the US authorities classify them as being so important.

    There is no possible justification for the release of this document other than to harm the U.S.  The document has nothing to do with policy or diplomacy or any of the other excuses used for the release of diplomatic cables.

    In related news, Julian Assange is renewing his threat to release his “insurance” file, supposedly the most sensitive documents, if he is arrested or WikiLeaks shut down.

    I say we call Assange’s bluff, even if it is not a bluff.  No negotiation with terrorists.

    ——————————————–
    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Visit the Legal Insurrection Shop on CafePress!
    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Tags:

    Comments


    .

    For all those ‘hang’em high’, ‘shoot’em in the head’ types who are unhappy at being told you are being lied to, what’s the problem? As long as it was alright for Dick Cheney and the Office of the Vice President to conspire to tell me the name of a top-secret CIA operative (Valerie Plame Wilson) then why all the hubbub about Wikileaks now?

    Ema Nymton
    [email protected]:o?
    .

    "For all those ‘hang’em high’, ‘shoot’em in the head’ types who are unhappy at being told you are being lied to, what’s the problem? As long as it was alright for Dick Cheney and the Office of the Vice President to conspire to tell me the name of a top-secret CIA operative (Valerie Plame Wilson) then why all the hubbub about Wikileaks now?"

    This is sarcasm. Isn't it? Or do you not know that it was someone in the State Department who revealed that Wilson's wife was, a not so secret, member of the CIA.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend