Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Non-Whites Are Accustomed To Getting Their Junk Fondled, or Something Like That

    Non-Whites Are Accustomed To Getting Their Junk Fondled, or Something Like That

    This one cannot wait for a Saturday night. 

    In listing the reasons why people are upset with TSA screening procedures, The New York Times plays racial psychologist:

    RACE AND CLASS.  Even though air travel is far from luxurious, it is a still a big expense during a time of significant economic upheaval, so the people affected tend to be a little better off and more entitled. While many nonwhite Americans have grown up in a country where they are sometimes searched while merely going about their business — unwarranted stop-and-frisks have gone on for decades — white people aren’t used to having the hands of the state on them without cause. Unfamiliarity breeds outrage.

    Notice the implication that non-whites are among the not-so-well off who do not travel by air, and also the assumption that non-whites are not outraged at having their breasts and genitals fondled by strangers just to board an airplane.  Talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations.

    I’ll go with James Joyner’s response:  “Uh huh.”

    ——————————————–
    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    It's funny, because when I flew to LA in June, there where quite a few Blacks and Hispanics on the flight.

    So they ones being patted down are Democrats, "the people affected tend to be a little better off and more entitled"? Who knew!?!?


     
     0 
     
     0
    sort of runic rhyme | November 29, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    That Times piece may be subheaded with "RACE AND CLASS", but the author works in a bit of homophobia further on, as well, for a Progressive trifecta of why we overwrought, spoiled and knuckle-dragging reactionaries protest the latest TSA security regime.

    The writer's attitude seems to be that, since some Americans are accosted in personally intrusive ways, the rest of us should be, as well. I'm not sure I buy the premise that such trangressions happen on a regular basis without reasonable suspicion, but granted it's possible, why don't our humanitarian betters wish MORE due consideration and process for any non-privileged victims, instead of wishing police state heavy-handedness on everybody, you know, to be fair?

    Is the America they want a nation that strives for better personal liberties (and self-responsibilites) for every citizen or one in which we're all equally treated as threats (except for the *real* white, rich and often liberal elites?) Oh, why ask, we know the answer.

    Count me among those who won't be flying domestically, anymore. The shuffling lines, speech restrictions, partial disrobing, scanning, feel-ups and fines and arrests for non-compliance couldn't be more punitive and debasing in their effect.

    And maybe unhealthy. I'm a bit worried for our Type A frequent flier businessmen (and women), the warriors of our economy, who'll be getting their testes (and breasts) irradiated A LOT.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend