Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Glenn Greenwald Plays Victim

    Glenn Greenwald Plays Victim

    I have criticized Glenn Greenwald on multiple occasions for playing the dual-loyalty card against American Jewish supporters of Israel.

    Greenwald uses the phrase “Israel-firsters” and also recently accused Eric Cantor, the incoming Republican Majority Leader in the House, of pledging allegiance to Israel.

    The charge against Greenwald is not one of anti-Semitism, and my posts have made that clear.  Rather, the charge is that Greenwald, in his fervor to attack Israel and its supporters, is all too willing to use lines of attack which do not go to the merits of our policy towards Israel, but rather, play upon age-old smears against Jews.  This is a distinction Greenwald certainly understands.

    Rather than defend his writings, Greenwald instead plays victim, claiming he falsely has been charged by me and Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit with being anti-Semitic:

    And just in case you were wondering: yes, it is still true that if you question American policy toward Israel or criticize “pro-Israel advocates” in America, you will be immediately smeared as an Israel-hating anti-Semite by right-wing polemicists who strangely seem still to believe that these sad, discredited tactics will intimidate people and suppress such debate.  [Note: Links in original.]

    This is an intellectual dodge of the first magnitude.  No one is saying Greenwald cannot criticize Israel or its advocates. 

    The issue is why Greenwald feels the need to go much further, and accuse supporters of Israel — particularly American Jewish supporters of Israel — of being disloyal to the United States through the use of the term “Israel-firsters,” or accusing Eric Cantor of pledging allegiance to Israel.

    When Greenwald uses this language, he well understands that he is moving beyond the merits of his arguments into emotional territory which plays upon age-old stereotypes of Jews, both here and abroad. 

    I have yet to hear Greenwald’s explanation.  All I hear is someone who falsely plays victim.

    ——————————————–
    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments


    @Graham, if anyone should know the uses of hypocrisy, Greenwald should.

    For the record, Brad Dayspring, the press secretary for Eric Cantor wrote a piece in Politico on Cantor's comments:

    False accusations, echo chambers
    http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=53149A6B-CAD3-A124-F0F5FA1EB6792CD1

    Don't hold your breath for retractions from Ron Kampeas, Andrew Sullivan, Charles Johnson, and Greenwald.

    I am less troubled by Greenwald's comments than I am by how little Cantor's assurances to Netanayhu bother you, sir.

    I think your column is heading a little off track in trying to reason with Greenwald. The kind of disproportionate animus he has is clearly far more personal than political. In fact, I doubt politics or philosophy enters much into it at all.

    It would be interesting to know more about his family background. Besides saying he's from NYC, there's nothing about it that I've ever seen. He's such a resentful, bitter person, obviously in constant terror of his sense of inferiority. Every family has one it seems; certainly every Jewish family.

    I can't help but notice that you never make any substantive critiques of Greenwald. Its always his "tone" or "the historical relevance of the dual-loyalty charge," etc. etc. I mean, you never even tried to explain why his attack on Cantor was unwarranted. You just skipped to the optics.

    You pretend to be a lawyer all day – so don't you notice how weak that makes you look?


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend