Christine O’Donnell won the Delaware primary last night, and within minutes (literally) über liberal Rachel Maddow started running video and commentary on MSNBC about O’Donnell’s views on masturbation.
The pretext for sexualizing O’Donnell was a 1996 video in which O’Donnell was interviewed about her conservative Christian views on sex.
Before Maddow’s post, the subject mostly was the subject of left-wing bloggers, but Maddow took it mainstream on MSNBC’s primetime coverage.
An almost 15-year old video was all the excuse Maddow needed to take the story national. Because the fate of the nation turns on whether O’Donnell masturbates, at least to Maddow.
One can understand why Alan Colmes would get all excited about the subject, but why the person who runs the liberal feminist blog Feministe?
Because liberal feminism is dead, and has been for years.
The liberal feminist death march has continued through the sexualized attacks on Sarah Palin and other conservative women in more recent times.
But, it’s not like I didn’t see this coming.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tT0lln4SoXE?fs=1]
Update: The always classy NY Times starts off its headline article hit piece about O’Donnell’s win with this paragraph:
In the bright light of Wednesday morning, Christine O’Donnell, whose Republican primary victory upended the calculus for future control of the United State Senate, became quickly known to Americans as the woman who once made dire warnings about the negative impact of masturbation.
New Post, same subject: “What’s up w/obsession about O’Donnell’s opinions on sex?”
——————————————–
Related Posts:
Nuts and Sluts In Delaware
Palin Haters Killed and Field Dressed Liberal Feminism
“Put Your Laws All Over My Body”
Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Ron Coleman
Comments
Rachel is obviously trying to spin atteton away from her idol, the kenyan-in-chief.
I, for one, am sick and tired of the smarmy-ass condescending attitude of the progressive "tough guys", the ones that hide behind their anonymity of the internet. Eddie Izzard and Bill Maher are a couple of blights on our society, just as are you "tough guys". Fact is, I detest every fiber of your being. I loathe people like you, the perpetual whiners, sideliners, crying over spilt milk that wasn't yours to begin with. I propose that we settle our differences with a boxing/wrestling match. how about it? care to put your money where your mouth is? If you are going to provoke and attack, why don't we just call it what it is? I think the term is "Hater", someone who is blinded by jealousy that they have to attack viciously what they don't agree with. the only thing that silences a hater is a strong backhand, not one from the voting booth, but the one from the collective hand of America. Call them to task. ask if they would do the same. I'll be willing to bet that you find they are all cowards with no sense of loyalty to anyone but themselves.
Maddow? I don't like that guy.
Leave a Comment