Being someone who has taken an unnatural interest in Stimulus-funded sidewalks, I searched the report, and sure enough found this:
10. Town Replaces New Sidewalks With Newer Sidewalks That Lead to Ditch (Boynton, OK) – $89,298
“People around Boynton, Oklahoma were left scratching their heads after the town was awarded nearly $90,00096 to replace a quarter-mile stretch of sidewalk that was replaced only five years ago.
One longtime resident of Boynton, Ray Allen, said the project “had been the talk of the town recently, and none of it positive,” because it is “100 percent a waste of money.” Another resident, Mike Lance, noted that “the best indication of the absurdity of the project is what the contractor did with a section of sidewalk at the north end of town – one that fronts no homes or businesses, and leads directly into a ditch.” Officials with the Oklahoma Department of Transportation defended the project as necessary to bring the sidewalk into conformity with federal guidelines.”
Complaining about sidewalks may seem pedestrian, but there is a larger point.
The Stimulus Plan was — as many of us recognized at the time — just a way to buy votes by rewarding favored political groups. The reason infrastructure figured so large in the Stimulus Plan was that the work almost always is done by union labor. Whether a project really was needed, and whether it should and could have been paid for in the normal course by local government, was secondary.
Funding unnecessary sidewalks to help political allies is the ultimate walking around money.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.