Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Journolist Trig Emails – All About The Story Line

    Journolist Trig Emails – All About The Story Line

    I have posted before about the left-wing blogosphere’s obsession with mocking Trig Palin and attacking Sarah Palin for bringing Trig on stage during the campaign.

    Now, in the latest revelations from the Journolist archives, The Daily Caller reprints Journolist emails regarding Trig. And obsessed with Trig they were, filling 15 screens in The Daily Caller post.

    BUT, the emails were not what I expected. None of the Trig bashing that was prevalent in the blogosphere and even the mainstream media. Little talk of abortion, again, unlike the public attacks on Sarah.

    While it was clear that just days after her nomination Sarah Palin was widely hated by those on the Journolist, at least those who wrote emails had not yet exhibited full blown Palin Derangement Syndrome.

    Rather, the focus was on whether to jump on the bandwagon promoted by Andrew Sullivan and many others that Trig was Sarah’s grandchild not child, and that Bristol Palin was the real mother. As documented here before, this was a very widespread point of attack immediately after Sarah was nominated, and by no means limited to Andrew Sullivan.

    Some of the comments, to be fair, were benign and even protective. For example, Mark Kleiman of the Reality Based Community [sic] was all in favor of attacking Sarah on numerous points, but warned others “But leave the kid alone.” Ezra Klein, founder of the Journolist, wrote: “By all accounts she’s a wonderful mother, and devoted to her fifth son [sic]. Leave this be.”

    A common point throughout the e-mails was that it was better to leave the issue of parentage alone because it could backfire politically.

    Katha Pollit of The Nation cautioned:

    If this baby story is true, palin will come out looking like a hero — she stepped in when her teen freaked out, threatened suicide, whatever. She went to extraordinary lengths, like a mother should do, to protect her daughter and solve the problem! No abortion necessary! Another pro-life fable for our times.

    Shannon Brownlee of the New America Foundation took a similar line:

    Katha’s point is that while some might find it reprehensible to raise a grandchild as your own, many if not most American’s don’t share that view. If the point of investigating this is to discredit Palin and show her up as an unfit mother and therefore unfit VP, the story may backfire. She comes out looking like a heroine not a villain.

    The other theme was that it might be a set-up.

    Lindsay Beyerstein, an author who blogged at numberous websites, warned that it could be a Republican dirty trick:

    In the post-Rathergate era, journalists should be on their guard for Republican dirty tricks.

    If this story gains traction, regardless of its truth or falsity, the Republicans will take steps to neutralize the meme.

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the McCain campaign were to leak doctored evidence for the sole purpose of discrediting it and destroying the journalist who published it. That’s probably what the Killian memos were.

    We should also be on guard for “evidence” falling into the lap of an unknown and easily discredited figure. That’s probably what Rove did to neutralize the allegations of cocaine use by George W. Bush, lo these many years ago.

    If apparently well-substantiated allegations emerge, we should be alert for the story behind the story, so to speak.

    Mark Kleiman reiterated this fear of a set up:

    Politically, this smells like a red herring and a trap, and I think that the revelation that someone was sniffing around about it would outrage large numbers of voters. Palin’s public life presents a target-rich environment for

    So this story desperately needs a good leaving-alone.

    Adam Serwer of The American Prospect also smelled a set-up:

    I gotta say, if this is much ado about nothing, the McCain campaign may be very happy to air these rumors in public. It gives them their first big opportunity to say that she’s being attacked unfairly, and because Democrats are sexist.

    Rick Perlstein who worked for the Campaign for America’s Future, suggested a reporter should obtain medial information about the Palins (which probably would be a violation of law) on the sly:

    Remember how Eagleton went down: a reporter got a tip from someone who actually turned out (believe it or not, Nixon had nothing to do with it) to be a McGovern supporter worried he’d drag down the ticket. The reporter went to the hospital where Eagleton had allegedly been treated and said he was there to discuss Eagleton’s treatment, and an indiscreet hospital employee said something like s/he thought someone would find out about Eagleton’s mental problems (check this out; I’mworking from memory).

    It’s not like an enterprising reporter couldn’t try the same thing today.

    Of all the banter, perhaps the most important big picture item is that the discussion frequently centered on whether the story was worth running. This is the type of coordination and groupthink which has generated the criticism of the Journolist.

    Moira Whelan, a Huffington Post blogger and Director of Strategy at National Security Network, was most blunt about it (emphasis mine):

    I dont think anyone from this list is running with it, but as I see it, the task is to set the frame that the Palin pick showed bad judgment on McCain’s part. That way when/if it does pop, it gets into that meme without people having to express outrage.

    If you really want to know what they were afraid of, Kathleen Geier of Talking Points Meme summed it up:

    I am really hoping Palin will self-immolate and bring down the ticket with her.

    Because if she proves to be a popular choice who doesn’t screw up too badly, she
    could be really, really dangerous in the years to come.

    The emerging picture of the Journolist is that it served as a place where like-minded people who had great influence on how the media portrayed events were able to coordinate their story lines for the benefit of the Obama campaign.

    We saw the media bias on the surface; the Journolistas helped frame that bias below the surface.

    Update: Moe Lane points out that many of the e-mails centered on trying to analyze photos of Sarah Palin for signs of pregnancy, and bizarre speculation as to Sarah’s possible motives to lie.

    Andrew Sullivan takes pleasure in the fact that the Journlistas engaged in the same speculation he did, even though they criticized him for it publicly:

    Well, we now know, that, for some at least, I wasn’t crazy. I was just not disciplined enough to curtail what this blog airs in order to conform with what many Journo-listers believed were the interests of the Obama campaign. Any delusions that Journo-List was not, in part, a collusory venture to shape the media narrative in ways to benefit Obama, above and beyond ferreting out the truth about any and all candidates, must now be abandoned. Ezra Klein has already been caught in a bald-faced lie about his discretion in picking members; and the notion that this was simply a water-cooler collection of journalistic thoughts is also belied by the emails now published by the Daily Caller.

    Related Posts:
    Psst…Don’t Tell Andrew Sullivan Our Secret
    Wonkette Goes After Trig Palin Again
    Are Anti-Palin Intellectuals Anti-Intelligence?

    Follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    Just too bad that Sarah was so defensive on Couric (which democraplite McCain staffers booked her on no doubt to 'self immolate') that she played right into the socialist meme with little time to correct that mistake. Though she has been more correct on most issues of the day than the vaunted democraps and Obama Administration, her fauxes pas(es) have been used to Quayle-ize her.

    btw, memo to Sullivan.

    Yes, you are crazy. You might have had company, but yes, you are crazy.

    exodus2011 | July 26, 2010 at 7:56 pm

    How many others, like me, feel like taking a shower, and then going for a walk somewhere beautiful ….. to try and remove from the mind such sordid activity ….. I don't know how I would react if I saw any of these journOlist people in public ……

    Does anyone know HOW DC came into possession of these emails? Could it be that someone on that list has had a change of heart and is doing the country a service by shining a light on this shameful and degrading activity?

    "If you really want to know what they were afraid of, Kathleen Geier of Talking Points Meme summed it up:
    'I am really hoping Palin will self-immolate and bring down the ticket with her.

    Because if she proves to be a popular choice who doesn’t screw up too badly, she could be really, really dangerous in the years to come.'"

    The hypocrisy in that statement leaves me nearly breathless. Geier, ignoring the danger she herself poses to the American political process by volunteering to be a propagandist disguised as a reporter, worries that a popular politician is dangerous to the political process? Puh-leeeze!

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend