Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Can Israel Survive A Second Obama Term?

    Can Israel Survive A Second Obama Term?

    This past week has seen the coming together of the growing Islamist-Leftist Coalition in the war against Israel.

    Leftists who, among other things, claim to believe in freedom of speech, women’s rights and equality for gays, are in political bed with people who would cut their throats for blasphemy, revel in abhorrent misogyny, and execute gays.

    The Leftists do not see the sick irony, and the Islamists are happy for the help from these Useful Idiots.

    This Islamist-Leftist Coalition is emboldened as never before. People like Greta Berlin, who previously found it sufficient to shout down speakers on U.S. campuses, now find it possible with the help of the Islamists to mount large-scale provocative flotillas. The global Boycott, Divest and Sanctions movement against Israel has left-wing academics and students as its foot soldiers, and left-wing bloggers fight the information war against Israel.

    The Leftists may feel they are bringing needed supplies to Gaza, but the Islamists understand that the bigger game is to allow Iran inspection-free shipping of weapons to Hamas. No wonder the Iranians are eager to get involved in supporting the next flotilla.

    It need not have to come to this.

    While the currently fashionable argument is that that unyielding support for Israel is disloyal to the United States (“Israel-Firsters” in their words), in fact this unyielding support has kept the peace between Israel and its three major bordering nations by tamping down any hope that Israel could be destroyed.

    This peace through the strength of the U.S.-Israel alliance was in the United States’ interest. By keeping nation states out of the fight against Israel we advanced our own interests.

    While wars in the past years have been fought between Israel and proxy groups such as the PLO and Hezbollah in dysfunctional Lebanon, and Hamas in Gaza, for the first time in almost 40 years we are facing the potential of a war between nations in the Arab-Israeli conflict.

    Is there anyone who would be surprised to see a regional war?

    Except this time it will be more widespread, involving not just Arab countries such as Syria, but also Iran and possibly Turkey. It seems highly unlikely that Egypt and Jordan would join such fight at the outset, but if Israel were so badly damaged that it became vulnerable, would these countries honor their peace treaties, or deliver the coup de grâce?

    Will Israel find itself in the same position in which it found itself in 1973, where its very existence depended upon the President of the United States ordering a military resupply?

    Caroline Glick (h/t Israel Matzav) astutely observes the destabilizing effects of Obama’s foreign policy:

    As for the US, in the year and a half since Obama took office he has fundamentally restructured US foreign policy in a manner that rewards US enemies at the expense of US allies….

    Israel of course is the US’s most threatened ally. And Obama’s treatment of Israel has been uniquely shabby–and dangerous…. By seeking to appease Iran and Syria for their aggressive behavior and by courting an ever more radical Turkish regime, Obama has humiliated Egypt and Jordan that signed peace treaties with Israel. In so doing, he has convinced the Arabs that the only way to retain and expand their power is by attacking Israel.

    Obama administration oratory and actions have rekindled hope for the destruction of Israel, and thereby unleashed the beast.

    The damage done so far may not be irreparable, but we are on an incredibly destructive trajectory.

    I really wonder whether Israel can survive a second Obama term.

    ——————————————–
    Related Posts:
    Hollywood Stars Open “Dialogue” With Iran
    It’s Approaching 3 a.m. for Israel
    Passover Is No Time To Wish For The End Of Christian America

    Follow me on Twitter and Facebook
    Bookmark and Share

    DONATE

    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.

    Comments



     
     0 
     
     0
    Ralph | June 7, 2010 at 11:34 am

    I wonder if my liberal friends see me as someone just like a muslim or palestinian, or any other political/religious affiliation, in that we disagree, sometimes strongly, but do live peaceful, co existent lives. Is the world one big United States, where 60's hippies are still trying to buy the world a coke?

    The premise of your post is based on the assumption that the United States survives a first term of B Hussein Obama…if we get past that challenge then we can look and see how many other free nations he will doom in the near future.

    Does wishing and signing papers for a 'Nuke Free' Middle East make it so?

    So it's the nation on stage, backed against the wall, going rogue by the COMPLETE CHOICE of the world wide audience, that has to just light up the enemy from here to Kingdom come.

    There will be some hand slapping and tears but the new world order will last us another 60 years or so of peace and tolerance.

    The leftists, socialists and communist parishioners at the altars of their own interests and regimes cannot save themselves or anyone else, they're too busy grabbing all the money and power for themselves to be interested in anyone else and they'll go down, like they periodically do.

    This next fight has been nuclear from the start. Good vs. Evil


     
     0 
     
     0
    Tal G | June 7, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    Regime change – attempt #2

    After the first time that the Obama admin flipped out on Bibi (ie. the Ramat Shlomo zoning announcement), some trial balloons went out claiming that Obama's real goal was getting a change of the Israeli government (Might have been Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic). Right after that was a weird, cooked, and soon debunked Haaretz poll claiming that most Israelis thought Obama was sympathetic to their interests.

    It's that strange atmosphere that has returned now. Even though the IHH has apparently distributed pictures of bloodied and bound IDF soldiers, the MSM seems to still be calling these people "peace activists". It doesn't make sense that this can still be a major international incident (with calls for a UN investigation etc.) when it is so clear that the dead were part of a known extremist group and that they attacked and subdued lightly-armed soldiers.

    Previously Obama tried to rally the Europeans and UN against Bibi for the Jlem building freeze. So it doesn't seem like such a stretch that this international flipout on Bibi is a slightly more subtle attempt to prod Israelis into wanting to swap him for Tzipi Livni. If this is correct, we can expect to see more of this extreme (and unjustified) criticism of him on an ongoing basis.


    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend