Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Admiral Sestak Needs Loose Lips To Save His Sinking Ship

    Admiral Sestak Needs Loose Lips To Save His Sinking Ship

    Admiral Joe Sestak’s political ship is sinking. Not from loose lips, but the opposite.

    Sestak has stated more than once that someone in the Obama administration offered him a job if he would drop out of the Democratic primary against Arlen Specter.

    But Sestak is sticking by the admonition that “loose lips sink ships.” Sestak refuses to reveal who said what to whom, and who knew what when.

    Has Sestak not studied history? This shall not stand.

    Keep it up, and Sestak may end up on the receiving end of a special prosecutor, likely as witness not target, but one never can be too careful. Just ask Scooter Libby. (Eric Holder apparently is refusing to appoint a Special Prosecutor, but I do not expect that refusal to last.)

    18 U.S.C. section 210 provides:

    Whoever pays or offers or promises any money or thing of value,to any person, firm, or corporation in consideration of the use or promise to use any influence to procure any appointive office or place under the United States for any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

    18 U.S.C. section 211 provides:

    Whoever solicits or receives, either as a political contribution,or for personal emolument, any money or thing of value, inconsideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both….

    Is Sestak refusing to talk on advice of counsel so that there is no waiver of his 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination? Or is Sestak refusing to talk just because Admirals don’t talk?

    Legally, Sestak is right to keep quiet.

    Politically, there is only one thing which can keep Sestak’s ship from sinking — loose lips.

    Related Posts:
    Specter’s Legacy
    Relax, The Dems Will Screw Up

    Follow me on Twitter and Facebook
    Bookmark and Share


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    OK, that makes more sense.

    18 USC 600:

    "Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of
    Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or
    special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select
    candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

    So Sestak comes out and accuses the President of the United States of a crime…and then stops. Seems Big Journalism is missing a few of their most basic lessons in asking questions the rest of us learned in grade school:

    Who: Specifically who did make this offer to you?
    What: What specific job was offered to you?
    Why: Did they specify exactly the reason they were making the offer?
    When: On what day did you receive the offer?
    Where: Where were you when the offer was made?
    How much: Were any other members of your family offered inducements such as this?

    Mr Senstak, I suggest you get some truthful answers to these questions ready. You may get asked them while under oath.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend