Most Read
    Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

    Yglesias Uses Bigoted Slur To Object To Bigotry

    Yglesias Uses Bigoted Slur To Object To Bigotry

    Matthew Yglesias is one of the best-known left-wing bloggers who does not hesitate to attack anyone he considers to be bigoted (under very expansive and political definitions). Yglesias blogs at Think Progress, a blog run by the Center for American Progress. Think Progress, much like Media Matters (also started by CAP), scours the internet seeking to find a Republican or conservative who has said a word or phrase which could be construed as or twisted into an insult to some group.

    Yet Yglesias resorted to bigoted language in talking about whether Republicans would object to a homosexual nominee to replace David Souter on the Supreme Court. Republican Senator John Thune said that nominating someone who was openly gay to the Supreme Court “would be a bridge too far right now.” Yglesias called this comment “old-fashioned, un-subtle bigotry.”

    In that very same post, however, Yglesias referred to a possible heterosexual nominee as a “breeder,” which is a derogatory term for heterosexuals. Using that term is the equivalent of calling a homosexual a “fag.” Sounds like new-fashioned, un-subtle bigotry. I can’t wait to see the Media Matters’ press release.

    The very same day that Yglesias resorted to a bigoted slur, Yglesias separately attacked Republican Senator Jeff Sessions, minority leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, for allegedly making racist comments over 20 years ago. Sessions’ two-decades-old offense was attempting to make a joke that he thought the KKK was “OK” until he found out that some of them were “pot smokers,” and for describing the NAACP and ACLU as “un-American” and “communist inspired.” Sessions claimed the remarks were taken out of context, but Yglesias rejected any such possibility, asking rhetorically, “And on the second [hand] what was the context.” (Italics in original.)

    So, what was the context of Yglesias using the term “breeder”? Perhaps it’s time Yglesias and Think Progress practiced what they preach.

    UPDATE: The dog-whistle must have sounded, because the left-wing blogs are in full-throttled attack mode on Jeff Sessions, following the Think Progress theme of “racial insensitivity.”

    UPDATE No. 2: In a response to this post, Yglesias states that I am humorless, and that he falsely was accused of “anti-straight bigotry,” which is not possible since he is a “hetero-American.” He misses the point (or avoids it, take your pick). He was accused of using a bigoted word (which he now uses as the title of his response post), which in and of itself would be the sort of thing frequently used by liberals to get people they don’t like fired (e.g., Don Imus). Whether he is a bigot or not is irrelevant to the point, as it was to Don Imus.

    Related Posts:
    Further Proof Liberal Bloggers Need To Study History
    Liberal Ugliness Revealed On The JournoList

    Follow me on Twitter and Facebook


    Donations tax deductible
    to the full extent allowed by law.


    This is unbelievable. You think “breeder” is a serious slur that is even faintly equivalent to Imus’s offenses (or, more specifically, “fag”)? I’ve never heard it as anything other than a joke.

    I’m not sure which possibility is worse: that you’re actually deranged and out-of-touch enough to believe this, or that you’re desperate to level opportunistic charges of “bigotry” even when it’s obvious that they’re inane.

    Wow, as a hetero-sexual I think I might never truly recover rom the trauma of being called a breeder by fellow-hetero Yglesias. I think it probably stings just about the same as for that gay kid in high school who took all sorts of abuse.

    You must have a lot of insensitive gay friends who don’t shy away at all from calling you names based on your abnormal, unusual character traits – ya know, being straight. I just can’t believe you’ve been able to put up so long with the anti-straight bigotry being thrown out there by all those teh gays. It’s just infuriating.

    Hey guess what… it doesn’t really matter what color your skin is, what your sex is or what your sexual preference is. The liberals wish to imprison us with their silly, hypocritical rules, letting us know who can and cannot say certain words and phrases. They can all suck it, since I say what I like, and am not bound by their petty mores.

    First of all, “breeder” is in no way whatsoever on a par with “fag”. It’s almost like you think there is some bizarro universe (the San Francisco of your imagination, perhaps) where gay bullies scrawl “breeder” on some poor misunderstood straight kid’s locker and beat him up after school. Do you know even one gay person? If so, I double-dare you to go up to that person and ask him what he thinks of your breeder=fag theory, and report back what he says on your blog. That would be interesting.

    Second, and more importantly: Matt Yglesias is straight. That means he gets to use all the anti-straight slurs he wants (such as they are). Don’t you know this basic rule? Or do you think that Jackie Mason is a huge anti-semite for making fun of Jews, and Snoop Dogg is racist because he says the n-word every two seconds?

    In any case, it’s this second point that logically separates the Yglesias case from, say, the Imus case: even if we grant that “breeder” is a legitimately bigoted term, Yglesias is a member of the group he is supposedly denegrating; the same cannot be said for Imus.

    Leave a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Notify me of followup comments via e-mail (or subscribe without commenting.)

    Font Resize
    Contrast Mode
    Send this to a friend