The latest internet outrage-bubble started with a post at Politico titled RNC’s below-the-belt shot at Nancy Pelosi, regarding a Republican National Committee YouTube video about Nancy Pelosi. I agree with AllahPundit that the RNC should not have produced the video, among other reasons, because “they simply have to be more attuned to how their message will be received and whether they’re giving their opponents easy opportunities to distort it.”
And most of the distortion comes from the fanciful post by Andie Coller at Politico, which reads way too much into the video. The point of the Politico post, right up front, is that “when you see Nancy Pelosi, the Republican National Committee wants you to think “Pussy Galore.” To substantiate its theory, Politico says that the video compares Nancy Pelosi to the fictional character Pussy Galore of the James Bond film Goldfinger.
But the opening camera-aperture shot and theme music are not from Goldfinger, but from the movie Dr. No. Politico also states that the video “puts Pelosi side-by-side with the aforementioned villainess” (Pussy Galore). Don’t blink or you will miss the “side-by-side” screen shot, which lasts maybe a second, and doesn’t clearly indicate who is the other woman next to Pelosi. And the closing tag line refers to: “Lack of Leadership. Democrats Galore.”
So there is precious little in the actual video to suggest that the RNC intended to “equat[e] the first woman speaker of the House with a character whose first name also happens to be among the most vulgar terms for a part of the female anatomy.” I agree, as stated at the beginning, that the RNC should not have produced the video, but the Politico has erred both in its facts and in asserting that the video “implies that Pelosi has used her feminine wiles to dodge the truth.”
The Politico article is mostly about the inner-workings of Andie Coller’s mind and the need to generate news on a holiday weekend, not about any true outrage.
The reaction from the blogosphere to the Politico post is mostly hypocrisy from the left. The left-wing blogs which savaged Sarah Palin and Carrie Prejean with the worst sexual innuendos and mockery, are aghast with feigned indignation at the RNC’s dig at Pelosi.
Ta-Nahisi Coates writes of the video that the Republicans couldn’t help demeaning an opponent rather than debating her because “it’s just who they are.” This is the same Ta-Nahisi Coates who wrote of John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin: “I don’t care if you know a thing about foreign policy. I don’t care if you know a damn thing about the economy. Here is what you are to me–breasts, hair and a lovely smile.” And who referred to Sarah Palin’s selection as being the result of “bigotry, ignorance and cravenness.”
Taylor Marsh’s comment on the ending tag line is as follows: “Imposed with a naked woman behind the tag line. Get it? Subtle it is not.” Actually, very subtle. Look at it and it’s hard to tell what is behind the tag line, much less a “naked woman.” Don’t stare too long, though,
and or you might start making up more things, just like Andie Coller and Taylor Marsh.
A misguided video which fell far, far short of the abuse heaped on Republican or conservative women, yet fodder for the left-wing blogosphere on a slow news weekend.
UPDATE: I’ve been criticized for having a victim mentality because I pointed out the distortion by the left-wing blogs, yet still don’t think the ad should have been run by the RNC. The two points are not inconsistent. As I well know, the left-wing blogs are shameless and dishonest in their ability to distort. I agree that such distortions should not shape our conduct. But the RNC, being an organization which has to carry a larger message and organizational effort, needs to be more careful in how it makes its point. What the RNC does as an organization affects not just the RNC, but candidates down the line. An individual blogger or non-party entity has no such concern. Take away the James Bond theme, and the video is compelling, effective, and appropriate for a national party to run.DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.